Why I love and hate lists

When I think of lists, I think of to-do lists. I love all of the other lists that rank and grade  from David Letterman’s Top Ten to the AP Top 25 in college football and basketball to any list of the 100 greatest fill-in-the-blank. But the to-do list tops my own list category.

The form of  to-do lists can range from what you need at the grocery store scribbled on the back of an envelope to the wonderfully designed TeuxDeux. People, too, generally fall into the category of compulsive  list-maker or the category of thinking they don’t need one.

I’m in the middle, but I need to push myself to become a compulsive list-maker and list-checker-offer. My problem: I make a list, feel defeated by all the things I have to do, and go spend some time on social media. Not the way to get things done. In fact, I usually find more ideas, more things to do the more I’m on social media.

Guides abound for making lists and making effective lists. I’ve looked at many. I’m entranced by planners and systems for getting things done. It’s like believing in leprechauns. If I just find the right system, I’ll be organized and productive. I’m beginning to give up that dream and focus on what I need to do to be an effective list maker and do-er. Here’s my list of what I’ve learned and what I hope to put into practice.

1151807_to_do1. I need to write things down. With a pen. In a cool book/planner. Or on a big piece of paper to hang on my wall.

2. I need a big, long-range list of things to do to keep me focused on the big picture.

3. I need to break down that big, long-range list of things to do into small, d0-able parts. Action steps.

4. I need to stop looking at my to-do list as a wish list. It’s a do list. While the act of writing it down is important, it’s not getting it done.

5. I need to prioritize. All those planning/organizing guides make this point very clearly. Sometimes, though, it’s nice to check something off the list.

6. I need to avoid hijacking by email, Twitter,Facebook. Part of making a list is being productive. While I find Twitter to help in my overall productivity and growth, I also spend a lot of time on it, feeling as if I’m accomplishing something. Twenty minutes later, not so much.

7. I need to be specific in my list. This is linked to the small, do-able parts section of No. 4. How will I tell when I have accomplished what I wanted to get done? So my list can’t just say work on research project. What do I want to get done today?

8. I need to be realistic. In my list-making zeal, I can go on and on. One planning guide suggested that most of us can really accomplish three things in a day.

9. I need to be consistent in my lists and my working life. I tend to go in spurts, but it’s hard to work on long-range projects that way.

10. I need to celebrate my success and look at ways to conquer my challenges.

Oh, wait. Maybe that’s another list.

 

 

 

Small ball and journalism

Forgive the sports metaphor, but the College World Series has rubbed off on me.

Small ball is a metaphor for probably what’s ahead in journalism. Start-ups and smaller news organizations will become more and more common. Nicco Mele has written about this phenomenon on a larger level in “The End of Big” where he describes how “radical connectivity” — the power of the Internet and mobile — is changing everything. In the latest Nieman Reports, he writes about the effect on journalism and his fears for what is next for investigative journalism. Mele says he is worried the most about the “loss of investigative journalism–holding power accountable–and the loss of a broad public sphere.” I’m worried about those two things as well. This self-proclaimed digital guy ends the essay with this:

“This is an exciting time to be a journalist. Opportunities abound; start-ups proliferate by the day. The future won’t look like the past. It won’t be the same, and it’s up to us to make sure that there is continuity in the core values of the profession as it is transformed.”

Screen Shot 2013-06-27 at 1.44.05 PMOne example of this new small sphere highlighted in the Nieman Reports is  Homicide Watch D.C., run from Laura Amico’s kitchen table. The site, which has as its mission to  “mark every murder death, remember every victim and follow every case, ” is a terrific example of what a very small newsroom can do. I am inspired by her work on many levels, but I was even more inspired by these words Laura Amico wrote:

“I’m a journalism. I believe in journalism, and I believe in our communities. I believe in holding those in power accountable. I believe in building civic knowledge. I believe in celebrating the good and trying to understand and solve the bad. But mostly I believe in storytelling, in the power of stories to validate who we are, how we live our lives, and our experiences, and the power of stories to allow us to enter into a communion with our communities, sharing who we are, and perhaps together, becoming who we would hope to be.”

I believe in that kind of journalism too. I believe it can be done in small shops and big newsrooms. I think many journalists also believe those same ideals, and we have to let them show in our work and the way we work.

Becoming fearless

Picture of Saide, a Shih Tzu.

Playing with my dog offers a great distraction when my frustration level gets too high.

One of my mantras these days is that young and old journalists have to be fearless — not reckless — but fearless when it comes to trying new things. Today I have wrestled with Photoshop, WordPress and assorted other programs to get this blog looking better. I still have a ways to go, but it feels good to live out the mantra. With help from tutorials and occasional breaks to pet my dog when the frustration level got high, I managed to make a logo and put it in place. It still needs work, but I’m happy to get this far.

I often ask people to help me do things, which many times ends up with the more competent person just doing it. I want to stop that and start more of the figuring out things on my own. I think I’ll probably need lot of frustration breaks with Sadie, but I know I can do it.

I love my job, No. 2

Being a college professor is more than just standing up in front of a class. It takes hours to prepare for that class, time to grade and figure out assignments, time to assess whether students are really learning what we intend. We do research to learn new things about the world we inhabit and then try to bring those insights back into the classroom. We advise students. We serve on committees. We go to meetings. We try to make the university a better place all the time.

I am lucky to be among terrific colleagues at Creighton and particularly in the College of Arts and Sciences. It’s a diverse group from philosophers to scientists, historians to journalists. There writers and actors, musicians, theologians … the list goes on and on. And while meetings are not my favorite venue, I am often energized after ones here because we get things done. We listen to new ideas (and some old ones) and often, though not always, things happen.

Creativity and passion are the fuels to making things happen. And I have two excellent examples.

Postcard from Just My TypeMy JM&C colleague Jennie Glaser-Koehler challenged her typography class to come up with their lives in six words, then design those words. The results are in a show called “Just My Type” at the Skutt Student Center. The memoirs and designs will make you laugh and think.

Dr. Baba Jallow came to Creighton’s History Department on a little different route. A journalist in his home of The Gambia in west Africa, he had to leave that life when his own life and that of his family were threatened. He talked to one of my classes today of his willingness to put himself at risk as a journalist because  human development depends on the development of minds and the human spirit, things that can’t happen when there is no freedom of expression. His passion for that freedom was inspiring.

 

I love my job, No. 1

On days when I’m feeling behind on grading, overwhelmed with the changes in journalism, I love getting a reminder of why I teach and why I love teaching at Creighton. On this particular Monday, two of my favorite students paid me surprise visits. I put away the grading without a backward glance and caught up with Aurora Driscoll and Molly Mullen. Social media allows me to

keep up virtually with friends, but there is nothing like sitting across from someone and sharing laughter, stories and a few tears. I do love working with students and then being able to watch them continue to grow and develop in work and in life. Like many here at Creighton, advising doesn’t stop when students receive a diploma. I love talking with them about the successes and challenges as they navigate life after college, to hear what they have learned and what else we need to do to help prepare those who come after them.

So now, it’s back to grading but with a smile on my face. Thanks Aurora and Molly.

Molly Mullen in her role as Creightonian editor-in-chief

Molly Mullen in her role as Creightonian editor-in-chief

Aurora in class

Aurora Driscoll on Pie Day in Social Media class in April 2011

Do Twitter ultimatums work?

tweeterThe question is a continuing one: How often should one tweet in the course of a day? How much is too much? On the face of it, it’s a difficult question to answer. It depends. But it’s actually an easy answer. Tweet when you have something to say, something of value to add to the conversation swirling around you. Add value. Be authentic.

It depends is not a helpful answer to students or to people unfamiliar with Twitter or social media. So you get ultimatums like this one reported by the Independent that says Daily Telegraph writers and editors will have to have a certain number of tweets per day with editors averaging about four per hour.

It can be hard to move news staffs and people unused to social media or avidly opposed to social media to a place where they feel comfortable posting tweets. I would hope the Daily Telegraph adds training and coaching to help reporters and editors see the value in tweeting, the value of mindcasting vs. lifecasting, and how Twitter can be such a valuable resource.

It’s a good reminder to me to coach my students more in using Twitter. Though they are under 25, many are recalcitrant about using Twitter or other social media. Coaching and training to help them find ways to use social media to add value to the conversation instead of just more noise to sort through can help. But an ultimatum of tweeting so many times a day or a week just adds to the noise.

 

Sometimes I need a reminder about the power of story

I’ve just read through a stack of papers for one of my classes where students have to reflect on whether they are optimistic or pessimistic about the journalism in the future. They base their essays on readings and discussion and their own experiences. But I find that even the most optimistic are looking to a journalism of short. Many talked of journalism having to be quick for people who don’t have a lot of time. They talk about Twitter and mobile devices.

Words on a pageOn paper after paper  I asked about stories, about whether we need to hear stories about people and our world in more than 140 characters. For many in the class, it’s one of the first times they’ve encountered the economic realities of journalism, aside from people asking them why they want to be journalists now. For now, with more time than money, the students insist they will always “just find someplace to get the information for free” if they are confronted with having to pay for content.

I’m encouraged by Robert Boynton’s essay on Byliner where he writes:

“It is important to remember that, however imperiled journalists feel, the big story is the fact that never before have so many people had so much access to such a diverse and enormous supply of information. And never before have they consumed so much of it. This is undeniably true, and of great benefit to mankind.”

I knew that, but I needed to read it and hear it again,

 

 

That’s why they call it social

I love social media. There. I’ve said it. I think it’s important for my job to figure out what’s here and what’s coming next. While I don’t pretend to be able to figure out the future of journalism, of news, I am confident there will be a social, interactive element.

I don’t love all social media. I really love Twitter. I like Facebook, LinkedIn and all the others. My attraction to the way Twitter works began many years ago when I worked for The Associated Press.

Carol with birds image.

Yes, I love Twitter.

While in charge of the desk/bureau for the day or evening, I would always have an index printer next to me. That printer was how different bureaus communicated with each other. It also spewed out stories on the A-wire (the main news wire), but just the headlines and a few words of each lead. See where I’m going here? For years, I had what was a Twitter-like printer next to me.

Of course, Twitter today has more features that that index printer ever did. I can be connected to people everywhere. I can respond. I can let other people see what I see. For me, a curious newshound with a short attention span, Twitter is familiar. I like the way it can connect me to people I normally might not communicate with, even if it’s only in 140 characters or so.

Am I too connected? Perhaps. I do have times everyday that I turn it off so I can focus on what I need to do. I understand that social media interactions don’t replace or mean the same thing as face-to-face interactions. And I know that what I put out there can be seen by many and won’t go away. I don’t put anything on any social media platform that I wouldn’t want everyone to see. My expectation is that it’s not private.

I like exploring the different tools of social media, though I don’t pretend to keep up with everything. Most of the new tools offer different ways to connect, to build relationships. The basics stay the same:  Be authentic. Be honest. Add value.

 

David Carr: You have to make stuff.

You have to make stuff. The tools of journalism are in your hands and no one is going to give a damn about what is on your resume, they want to see what you have made with your own little fingies. Can you use Final Cut Pro? Have you created an Instagram that is about something besides a picture of your cat every time she rolls over? Is HTML 5 a foreign language to you? Is your social media presence dominated by a picture of your beer bong, or is it an RSS of interesting stuff that you add insight to? People who are doing hires will have great visibility into what you can actually do, what you care about and how you can express on any number of platforms.”

Today, David Carr, the New York Times Reporter, was on Reddit’s IAMA.  I’m a big fan from reading his work and seeing him in “Page One.” He offers great advice

new_york_times_logo_2_270x203

to students and to people in the journalism field who wonder about their futures. You have to make stuff.  Your future and my future will be about what he says: what you can do, what you care about and how you can express it. It’s work. It’s learning new stuff all the time. It’s exhausting. But it can be exhilarating. You can talk to people, tell stories and listen to what people think about those stories. You can tell stories in new ways. But you have to make stuff.

The timing of Carr’s comments is terrific for me. I’m starting a new semester, feeling a bit overwhelmed and exhausted already from the new stuff I’m trying to learn and then teach and coach my students through. But this is it. And it is exhilarating.

 

 

It’s mine, all mine

I am not sure why I didn’t do this before, but I have my own domain. It’s definitely a learning curve, but timing is great as I can blog right along with my Feature Writing Class and my Intro to Mass Comm Tech class.

typewriterI’ve asked the students to write about writing and what they think about writing. It’s been a part of me for so long that I don’t think about what I like or don’t like. I just do it. As the years have gone by, I consider myself more of an editor than a writer, but that’s only until I start writing and then I remember why I like it.

  • I get to talk to people about all kinds of interesting things. And eventually, almost everything becomes interesting.
  • Then I get to tell other people about it.

What’s not to like? I like that good writing can move me to tears or laughter. Good writing can make me say, “Yes, it’s just like that.” I like finding the right word, the right metaphor, the right simile. I like taking out adjectives and adding great verbs. I like writing with a great pen on a page out of an artist’s sketchbook. I like writing at my kitchen table on my laptop or on my couch on my iPad.

I like short bursts on Twitter and long magazine articles that draw you in.  I like books and newspapers and magazines and online and the back of cereal boxes.

I like it all. I’m blessed to have jobs as professor and copy editor that let me write and edit and read and coach others to do the same.